0 To 60 Mph - Criticism of Magazine Testing

Criticism of Magazine Testing

Automobile magazines often post 0-60 mph times that they achieve in testing. Many have questioned the practices and methods used to test the automobiles. Typically criticism revolves around:

  • "Roll out" here the car is allowed to roll for a certain amount of time or distance before the timing begins.
  • General conditions: Air temperature, altitude, fuel level, etc.
  • "Factory Freaks" which would be abnormally quick stock automobiles
  • The public's inability to achieve such low times
  • High level of differences between magazines
  • Possible bribery or other unethical practices of the testers
  • Optimizing the car's performance by making setup changes such as tire pressure
  • The ability of the particular driver
  • Using unconventional gearing, by where the drive does shift but uses a low gear only just capable of reaching the desired speed.

Read more about this topic:  0 To 60 Mph

Famous quotes containing the words criticism of, criticism, magazine and/or testing:

    However intense my experience, I am conscious of the presence and criticism of a part of me, which, as it were, is not a part of me, but a spectator, sharing no experience, but taking note of it, and that is no more I than it is you. When the play, it may be the tragedy, of life is over, the spectator goes his way. It was a kind of fiction, a work of the imagination only, so far as he was concerned.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    I hold with the old-fashioned criticism that Browning is not really a poet, that he has all the gifts but the one needful and the pearls without the string; rather one should say raw nuggets and rough diamonds.
    Gerard Manley Hopkins (1844–1889)

    We are frequently told that talents and genius are natural gifts; and so indeed they are, to the same extent that the productions of the garden and the field are natural gifts.
    U. R., U.S. women’s magazine contributor. American Ladies Magazine, pp. 317-19 (June, 1829)

    Traditional scientific method has always been at the very best 20-20 hindsight. It’s good for seeing where you’ve been. It’s good for testing the truth of what you think you know, but it can’t tell you where you ought to go.
    Robert M. Pirsig (b. 1928)